The close takes ten to fifteen days
By the time the month is closed the information is history rather than a decision input, and the close consumes the capacity that should be spent on analysis.
A fractional CFO is an experienced finance executive who works with a company part-time, carrying the judgment of a full-time CFO at a fraction of the cost and commitment. F3 Insights embeds fractional CFO leadership in companies with $10M–$70M in revenue, then builds the financial systems that outlast the engagement.
A fractional CFO is the right answer when the company has outgrown bookkeeping and controller-level support but cannot yet justify a $300,000–$500,000 full-time hire.
By the time the month is closed the information is history rather than a decision input, and the close consumes the capacity that should be spent on analysis.
Department wish-lists roll up into a number whose error has never been measured. Nobody can say how wrong the forecast usually is, so nobody can trust how wrong it is now.
Growth consumes cash and the balance is a lagging indicator. Without a rolling thirteen-week view maintained weekly, a liquidity problem is discovered rather than managed.
Unit economics are not reliably computed, so pricing decisions are made on instinct and the realized price differs from list in ways nobody has quantified.
Their absence stops the reporting cycle. Diligence finds this quickly, and prices it as risk.
The request is reasonable and the answer takes two weeks, because the reporting was built for compliance rather than decisions.
A full-time CFO at a $10M–$70M company typically costs $300,000 to $500,000 in total compensation once salary, bonus, equity, benefits, and payroll taxes are counted. A fractional engagement buys the same seniority against a defined scope.
Total annual cost once salary, bonus, equity, benefits, and payroll taxes are counted, plus recruiting time and the risk of a mis-hire at a company that cannot absorb one.
Priced against a defined scope and cadence rather than a headcount line. Senior judgment applied where it changes decisions, without carrying an executive salary the P&L is not ready for.
Reconciled data, financial expert systems with review gates, the finance operating cadence, and documented playbooks. The engagement ends in transfer by design, not by exhaustion.
The comparison that matters is not hourly rate. It is whether the engagement leaves behind a finance function that runs without the person you hired: reconciled data, a forecast with measured error, a weekly cash view, and operators certified to run them.
Four layers, built bottom-up. The governed data layer comes first because an expert system on unreconciled data is a faster way to be confidently wrong.
One reconciled truth across accounting, CRM, and operational systems, with data contracts, lineage, and access. Built first, and non-negotiable.
Driver-based forecasting, close acceleration, cash and runway instrumentation, unit economics, and scenario engines for tariff, rate, and demand shocks, with explainable outputs and review gates.
The weekly cash review, the monthly close and business review, and the quarterly re-forecast, with standing agendas and named owners.
A finance operator inside the cadence from day one, proving the system in live decisions rather than staged demos, then certifying your team to run it.
A diagnostic runs two to six weeks and ends with a systems map, a problem ledger with costs attached, and a sequenced build plan. Start with a conversation about where finance is losing time.